Many believe that Soviet soldiers won the Great Patriotic War only due to heroism or, God forbid, detachments, having gone through the war with an outdated Mosin rifle or PPSh. However, this is not so; the Red Army had many weapons that were modern at that time. In this interim issue I will tell you about one of them. I’ll tell you something you probably didn’t know about before and show games that have it..

I still recommend watching the video. Not because of views or advertising (which is not there), it just shows the footage I shot from the teaching staff, as well as historical footage and many pictures that could not be inserted into the text version. But, in any case, enjoy watching or reading!

Alexey Ivanovich Sudaev. Without this simple guy, you definitely wouldn’t be reading this material 😀

Many believe that Soviet soldiers won the Great Patriotic War only due to heroism or, God forbid, detachments, having gone through the war with an outdated Mosin rifle or PPSh. However, this is not so; the Red Army had many weapons that were modern at that time. In this interim issue I will tell you about one of them. I’ll tell you something you probably didn’t know about before and show games that have it.

This article is about the Sudaev submachine https://yako-casino.uk/ gun.

The history of teaching staff begins in 1942, in the midst of the war. The Shpagin submachine gun, with all its obvious advantages in the form of great firepower, also had serious drawbacks, one of which was the complexity of production. More precisely, he was not enough simple and massive. In addition, from the first days of the war there were rumors about German machine gunners, allegedly “all” armed with MP-40s. The Soviets did not have the ability to mass produce PPSh at that moment. Therefore, a competition was held for new weapons. The main requirement was cheaper weapons, not inferior in characteristics to PPSh. And this is how the teaching staff became. Appearing in the second stage of the competition, he became a leader along with prototypes of Shpagin and Bezruchko-Vysotsky.

You can read how this competition was held with sweat and blood here.

Production was launched in besieged Leningrad. Factories evacuated to the Urals were not left in the city no special equipment or qualified personnel, and PPS, made by stamping in just 5 hours, was very helpful. Despite the fact that it was made entirely of steel, it wasted more than 30% less compared to PPSh. Moreover, he was twice as easy Shpagina. By that time it had already become clear that a drum magazine was not the best solution. PPP ate double-row box stores initially. The folding stock was convenient in confined spaces, and, according to my feelings, it is not as flimsy as on the MP-40, and the submachine gun itself is very comfortable and fits perfectly into the shooting position. A flame arrester was installed on the barrel, which diverted the powder gases horizontally. Of course, it’s hard to call it a flame arrester, just a piece of metal with holes on the sides. But it’s better than nothing. Cheap and cheerful. At the same time, the rate of fire is lower (~650 v/m versus 1000 v/m for Shpagin) compared to PPSh it gave soft recoil and the ability to control shooting even without firing mode translator.

Soviet submachine guns of the Great Patriotic War: PPD, PPSh and PPS. Unlike its counterparts, the PPD was discontinued early in the war for a number of reasons.

“PPS has proven itself in combat conditions. Sufficient range, accuracy of fire, ease of use, lighter weight compared to the existing ones give the right to consider it a good automatic weapon.” – says one of the reviews of front-line soldiers in 1944.

Sudaev’s very successful, simple and in many ways progressive submachine gun quickly gained popularity in the army, especially in tank, airborne and reconnaissance units, where the dimensions and weight of the weapon were much more important.

The teaching staff was modified on the fly, leaving the defenders of Leningrad straight from the factories.

“This machine is easy to set up, disassemble, assemble and master; the magazine is easy to equip, reliable and trouble-free in operation, always ready for action.” – soldiers of the 131st, 48th, 124th and 191st rifle divisions.

After various modifications, Sudaev had 7 options. The main ones were: PPS-42 (model 2), adopted in 1942, modified a year later PPS-43, and its more modified version PPS-43 (model 2).